Skip to main content

Russian troops capture one of two British FV104 Samaritan ambulances used by Ukraine

Breaking news


On May 18, 2024, the Russian Ministry of Defense revealed the capture of one of the two British FV104 Samaritan tracked ambulances purchased for the Ukrainian Army in the Novomykhailivka area. Captured by the motorized rifle brigade of troop group Vostok, the Samaritan is one of the rarest variants within the British CVR(T) family of armored fighting vehicles (AFVs), with only 100 units produced.
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* 468x15 data sheet menu top dark green */ google_ad_slot = "3500417247"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 15; // ]]>
google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* top_468x60_fiche_technique */ google_ad_slot = "2746785843"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 60; // ]]>

The Samaritan is one of the rarest variants within the British CVR(T) family of armored fighting vehicles (AFVs), with only 100 units produced and reportedly only two in service with Ukrainian forces. (Picture source: Russian social media and Armstrongs UK)


The evacuation of the damaged FV104 Samaritan from the battlefield was conducted by personnel of Vostok's evacuation group under the cover of darkness. Subsequently, it was taken to the brigade's repair unit for short-term repairs and maintenance. Following repairs, it is set to be showcased alongside other captured military equipment from the Ukrainian Armed Forces in an exhibition on Moscow's Poklonnaya Hill. A review of the captured vehicle was carried out, with a representative of the Rembat noting that this FV104 Samaritan is expected to serve within the Russian Armed Forces following its display in the exhibition.

The Ukrainian Armed Forces have received a notable quantity of variants within the British CVR(T) family of armored fighting vehicles (AFVs) as part of broader military aid efforts. Specifically, available information indicates that Ukraine has acquired two FV104 Samaritan ambulances among the 155 units of British armored vehicles procured through various volunteer and fundraising initiatives. These vehicles were sourced from private owners and auctions in the UK, with efforts led by organizations such as the Serhiy Prytula Charitable Foundation and the Ukrainian World Congress.

The FV104 Samaritan, a British armored tracked ambulance, is part of the Combat Vehicle Reconnaissance (Tracked) or CVR(T) family. Designed in the early 1970s by Alvis Vehicles Ltd, the Samaritan was developed to transport wounded soldiers from the frontline to field hospitals, offering a safe and armored environment for medical treatment during transit. The vehicle's design focuses on mobility and protection, including features such as mine protection, allowing it to operate in combat zones and rough terrain, ensuring wounded personnel can be evacuated swiftly and safely.


In terms of medical capabilities, the FV104 Samaritan is equipped with a suite of medical equipment, including stretchers and basic life-saving supplies. It can carry up to six seated casualties or four stretcher-bound patients, along with a medical attendant and driver. (Picture source: Army Recognition)


In terms of medical capabilities, the FV104 Samaritan is equipped with a suite of medical equipment, including stretchers and basic life-saving supplies. It can carry up to six seated casualties or four stretcher-bound patients, along with a medical attendant and driver. The vehicle’s armor provides protection against small arms fire and shrapnel, crucial for maintaining the safety of both medical personnel and patients during evacuation missions. Additionally, the Samaritan features a compact and agile design, allowing it to navigate difficult terrains and keep pace with frontline units, ensuring rapid response times in critical situations.

The FV104 Samaritan is powered by a Jaguar J60 4.2-liter petrol engine, delivering 195 hp, enabling a maximum speed of 72 km/h on roads and a range of approximately 483 km. The vehicle weighs around 8 tonnes and features a torsion bar suspension system, enhancing its cross-country performance. Its dimensions are relatively compact, measuring 5.07 meters in length, 2.24 meters in width, and 2.24 meters in height. These specifications ensure that the Samaritan can be easily transported and deployed in various operational theaters.

Historically, the FV104 Samaritan has seen extensive service with the British Army and other military forces. Since its introduction in the 1970s, it has been deployed in numerous conflicts and peacekeeping missions around the world, including the Falklands War, Gulf War, and operations in the Balkans and Afghanistan. The vehicle has demonstrated reliability and effectiveness in providing essential medical evacuation services under hostile conditions and is still used and upgraded today, demonstrating its perceived value in modern military operations.


Read more …Russian troops capture one of two British FV104 Samaritan ambulances used by Ukraine

  • Hits: 447

Russian Forces Capture Advanced European-Made THeMIS UGV Donated by Estonia to Ukraine

Breaking news


According to images released on social media on May 17, 2024, Russian forces have captured one of the most advanced European-made unmanned ground vehicles (UGV), the THeMIS.
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

Russian forces have captured one of the most modern UGV Unmanned Ground Vehicles designed and developed by the Estonian Company MILREM. (Picture source VK Social Network)


The THeMIS, an innovative UGV (Unmanned Ground Vehicle) designed and developed by the Estonian defense company Milrem, was delivered to Ukraine as part of Estonia's military aid. This capture marks a notable achievement for Russian forces, which have already seized several cutting-edge tanks and combat vehicles manufactured by European and American defense industries.

The THeMIS UGV is known for its versatility and advanced capabilities, including the ability to carry out a variety of missions, such as logistics support, intelligence gathering, and direct combat roles. Russian forces' capture of it provides them with access to the latest unmanned ground technology and raises concerns about the potential for reverse engineering and adaptation of the technology for their own use.

The capture of the THeMIS UGV by Russian forces is not just a military development but a potential game-changer in the conflict's technological balance. Its cutting-edge design and operational flexibility could significantly reshape ground operations.

The capture of advanced military technology by Russian forces, including the THeMIS UGV, has sparked intense discussions among defense experts. It underscores the persistent risks and challenges faced by Ukraine and its allies in ensuring that military aid does not inadvertently bolster the opposition.

The THeMIS (Tracked Hybrid Modular Infantry System) UGV, developed by the Estonian defense company MILREM, represents a significant advancement in unmanned ground vehicle technology. This versatile platform is designed to support a wide range of military operations, offering modularity, robustness, and advanced capabilities that make it a valuable asset on the modern battlefield.

The THeMIS UGV is a multi-role platform that can be adapted for various missions, including logistics support, reconnaissance, surveillance, and direct combat. Its modular design allows for integrating different payloads and systems, making it highly customizable to meet specific operational requirements. The vehicle is built on a tracked chassis, providing superior mobility across diverse terrains, from urban environments to rugged landscapes.

One of the standout features of the THeMIS is its modularity. The vehicle can accommodate interchangeable payloads, which can be easily swapped out depending on the mission. This includes systems for remote weapon stations, jammers, and sensors for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) operations. This flexibility ensures that the THeMIS can be rapidly reconfigured to address evolving battlefield needs, enhancing its utility and operational efficiency.

The THeMIS is equipped with a hybrid diesel-electric powertrain, which provides a significant operational range and allows for silent movement in electric mode, a critical feature for stealth operations. Its robust design includes a low center of gravity, ensuring stability even on difficult terrains and during the transport of heavy loads. The vehicle's tracked system enhances its mobility, allowing it to navigate challenging environments that wheeled vehicles might struggle with.

Regarding autonomy, the THeMIS offers several levels of control, from direct teleoperation to semi-autonomous and fully autonomous modes. Advanced sensors and navigation systems enable the UGV to perform complex tasks with minimal human intervention. For instance, it can follow pre-defined routes, avoid obstacles, and even coordinate with other units on the battlefield.

The THeMIS also features advanced communication systems seamlessly integrating with other military platforms and command structures. This interoperability is crucial for modern network-centric warfare, where real-time data sharing and coordination can significantly enhance operational effectiveness.

In terms of specifications, the THeMIS UGV measures 2.4 m in length, 2.15 m in width, and 1.11 m in height. It weighs approximately 1,630 kg (3,594 pounds) without payload and has a payload capacity of up to 1,200 kg (2,646 pounds). The hybrid diesel-electric powertrain allows for a maximum speed of 20 kilometers per hour (12.4 miles per hour) and an operational range of up to 100 kilometers (62 miles) on a single charge. The vehicle's tracked system provides superior mobility across varied terrains, and its advanced communication systems ensure effective integration with other military platforms and command structures.

The recent capture of the THeMIS UGV, one of the latest generation of European-made unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs), by Russian forces in Ukraine has the potential to impact the development of Russian-made UGVs significantly.  The insights gained from studying the THeMIS's modular design, autonomous capabilities, hybrid powertrain, and advanced communication systems could accelerate advancements in Russian UGV technology, potentially creating more versatile, efficient, and capable unmanned ground vehicles. This development underscores the strategic importance of cutting-edge technology in modern military conflicts and the ongoing technological arms race between leading defense industries.


Read more …Russian Forces Capture Advanced European-Made THeMIS UGV Donated by Estonia to Ukraine

  • Hits: 1250

Russia Prioritizes Destruction of US and European Combat Vehicles Targeting Another Ukrainian PzH 2000 Howitzer

Breaking news


Russian Lancet drone has successfully damaged a German PzH 2000 artillery system. The incident, captured on video and posted on the social media platform Telegram on May 17, 2024, underscores the priority of Russian forces to target and destroy modern military equipment received by Ukraine from European and US allies.
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

Video of the Lancet drone attack on a Ukrainian PzH 2000 155mm tracked self-propelled howitzer donated by Germany and Italy. (Picture source: video footage Telegram)


According to the video, the crew of the PzH 2000 howitzer abandoned the vehicle, which appears not to have been completely destroyed. This could be an opportunity for the troops to capture the most modern German-made artillery system for the first time.

The attack of the German-made PzH 2000 artillery howitzer is not an isolated event but part of a strategic approach by the Russian military. This approach specifically targets modern combat vehicles and equipment supplied to Ukraine by European countries and the United States, with the aim of neutralizing these advanced systems and shifting the balance of power in the conflict.

The PzH 2000, a state-of-the-art German self-propelled howitzer, offers significant advantages over the older Soviet-made 2S1 and 2S3 artillery systems still in service with the Ukrainian army. Compared to the 2S1 and 2S3, the PzH 2000 boasts a superior range, firing up to 40 kilometers with standard ammunition and even more with specialized rounds. In contrast, the 2S1 and 2S3 typically have a maximum range of around 15 to 18 kilometers. Additionally, the PzH 2000 features a much faster rate of fire, capable of delivering multiple rounds in rapid succession thanks to its advanced autoloader. In contrast, the 2S1 and 2S3 rely on slower, manual loading mechanisms. The PzH 2000 also benefits from modern targeting systems and enhanced mobility, providing better accuracy and the ability to quickly reposition on the battlefield, thus offering a substantial upgrade in offensive and defensive capabilities for the Ukrainian forces.

The Russian armed forces have increasingly relied on loitering munitions, such as the Lancet drone, to carry out precision strikes on high-value targets. These drones can hover over an area for extended periods before engaging their targets, making them a formidable tool in the Russian military's arsenal.

The Lancet drone, employed by Russian troops in Ukraine, serves as a highly effective loitering munition designed for precision strikes on high-value targets. These drones can hover over an area for extended periods before engaging, allowing them to effectively destroy modern military equipment supplied to Ukraine by European and US allies. The Lancet's use highlights Russia's focus on neutralizing advanced Western-supplied weaponry to diminish Ukraine's defensive and offensive capabilities, contributing to the evolving landscape of technological warfare in the conflict.

The Lancet-3 drone is a loitering munition developed by Russia, featuring a compact and lightweight design with a wingspan of approximately 1.2 meters and a weight of around 12 kilograms. It is equipped with an electro-optical system for target acquisition and guidance, providing high-precision strikes. The drone has an operational range of up to 40 kilometers and can hover over targets for an extended period before striking. Its payload includes a high-explosive fragmentation charge weighing about 3 kilograms, designed to destroy armored vehicles and other high-value targets, making it a versatile and effective weapon in modern warfare.

By focusing on destroying European and American equipment, Russia aims to deplete Ukraine's modern military resources, forcing it to rely on older, less effective systems. This strategy is intended to weaken Ukraine's defensive and offensive capabilities, thereby altering the balance of power in the conflict.

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has seen a steady influx of military aid from Western nations, with advanced weapons systems playing a crucial role in the country's defense strategy. The recent incident involving the Lancet drone serves as a stark reminder of the escalating technological warfare and the challenges faced by Ukrainian forces in countering Russian advances.


Read more …Russia Prioritizes Destruction of US and European Combat Vehicles Targeting Another Ukrainian PzH...

  • Hits: 15244

Russia Claims to Intercept 10 US ATACMS Missiles Over Crimea With Tor-M2 Air Defense System

Breaking news


The Russian Defense Ministry announced on May 15, 2024, that its air defenses successfully intercepted and destroyed 10 U.S.-supplied ATACMS ballistic missiles targeting Crimea early today. The missiles were reportedly shot down by Tor-M2 mobile air defense systems over the Black Sea.
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

The  Tor-M2 is a Russian-made air defense missile system that is able to intercept precision-guided munitions and missiles. (Picture source Russian MoD)


The Tor-M2, NATO code-named SA-15D, is a Russian mobile, short-range surface-to-air missile system designed to intercept and destroy various aerial threats, including aircraft, helicopters, drones, and precision-guided munitions. It features advanced radar and missile technology, capable of detecting and engaging targets within a range of up to 15 kilometers (9.3 miles) and at altitudes between 10 meters and 10 kilometers. The Tor-M2 can track and engage up to 48 targets simultaneously, and its missiles can engage four targets concurrently. This system is highly mobile and effective in all weather conditions, providing robust protection for ground forces and strategic assets from aerial attacks​.

According to the Russian Defense Ministry, the missiles were detected at approximately 5:00 AM local time and neutralized before reaching their targets. Sevastopol Governor Mikhail Razvozhayev confirmed the interceptions near the Belbek air base, adding that some missile fragments fell into residential areas but caused no casualties.

In recent months, Ukraine has escalated its use of drones and missile attacks on various targets within Russia, including oil refineries and fuel depots, as part of its efforts to repel Russian advances. This latest incident underscores the ongoing tension and the high stakes involved in the conflict, with significant military engagement from both sides.

Secretary Blinken's visit to Kyiv highlights the United States' continued diplomatic and military support for Ukraine amidst the ongoing war. The U.S. has been a critical ally to Ukraine, providing substantial military aid, including the advanced ATACMS missiles that were reportedly used in the latest attempted strike on Crimea.

The Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) is a U.S.-made surface-to-surface missile system with a range of up to 300 km (186 miles), capable of delivering precision strikes against high-value targets such as command centers, air defenses, and logistical hubs. Developed by Lockheed Martin, ATACMS missiles can be launched from the M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) and the M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS). They carry a variety of warheads, including unitary warheads and cluster munitions, making them versatile for different combat scenarios​.

The recent delivery of U.S.-supplied ATACMS missiles to Ukraine has garnered significant attention. In March 2024, the Biden administration quietly approved the transfer of long-range Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) to Ukraine as part of a $300 million military aid package. These missiles, with a range of nearly 200 miles, were sent to bolster Ukraine's capabilities against Russian forces.

The decision to provide these long-range missiles ended a lengthy debate between Washington and Kyiv. Initially, the U.S. had been reluctant to send such advanced weaponry due to concerns over escalating the conflict. However, the persistent Russian attacks on Ukraine’s infrastructure and the use of North Korean-supplied missiles by Russia led to a shift in the U.S. stance. President Joe Biden and his national security team, including Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, decided that the timing was right to provide these strategic assets to Ukraine.

The ATACMS missiles have already been used twice by Ukrainian forces: once against a Russian military base in Crimea and again near Berdyansk in southeastern Ukraine. These strikes underscore the significant impact these missiles can have in the ongoing conflict, potentially targeting high-value Russian assets and forcing strategic adjustments by Russian forces.

The provision of ATACMS is part of a larger U.S. military support strategy, which includes a new $1 billion aid package containing various other military equipment aimed at strengthening Ukraine's defense capabilities​.


Read more …Russia Claims to Intercept 10 US ATACMS Missiles Over Crimea With Tor-M2 Air Defense System

  • Hits: 941

Ukrainian Strikes Target MiG-31s at Belbek Air Base in Crimea with ATACMS Missiles

Breaking news


Recently, Ukrainian forces have intensified their offensive against Russian military installations in Crimea, specifically targeting the Belbek Air Base. This strategic site for the Russian Air Force regularly hosts MiG-31 interceptors. Reports, including satellite imagery and details from Forbes, indicate that coordinated strikes occurred on the night of May 14-15, with subsequent possible attacks causing substantial damage to both aircraft and air defense infrastructure, such as S-300 or S-400 systems.
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* 468x15 data sheet menu top dark green */ google_ad_slot = "3500417247"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 15; // ]]>
google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* top_468x60_fiche_technique */ google_ad_slot = "2746785843"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 60; // ]]>

Satellite images taken before and after the ATACMS strikes reveal the destruction of at least two MiG-31 aircraft, as well as significant damage to infrastructure (Picture source: X Channel @bayraktar_1love)


These attacks were partially executed using the Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS), a long-range strike capability provided by the United States. The deployment of these missiles enabled strikes on targets up to 305 kilometers away, effectively covering the entirety of Crimea. Satellite images from Planet Labs revealed significant scorched areas on the main flight line of the base, indicating major impacts. Additionally, it was reported that air defense radars detected the incoming missiles two minutes before impact, suggesting limited time for countermeasures.

The Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) is a surface-to-surface missile developed by Lockheed Martin for the United States Army. Production of the ATACMS began in 1986, with the missile entering service in 1991. Designed for precision strikes, the ATACMS is capable of delivering a variety of warheads, including cluster munitions and unitary high-explosive payloads. Its primary use is to engage high-value targets such as air defense systems, command and control centers, and logistics nodes.

The ATACMS boasts a range of between 100 and 305 kilometers (62 to 190 miles), depending on the variant, allowing it to strike targets well behind enemy lines. The missile is launched from the M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) and the M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS), providing flexibility and mobility on the battlefield. Its precision guidance and significant range make it a crucial asset for modern artillery operations.

The MiG-31, equipped with long-range R-37 missiles, poses a significant threat to Ukrainian forces, necessitating operations at lower altitudes to avoid detection. Although no confirmed losses of MiG-31s have been reported following these attacks, multiple aircraft suffered damage, and key air defense equipment was destroyed.

The MiG-31 is a supersonic interceptor aircraft developed by the Mikoyan design bureau in the Soviet Union. Production of the MiG-31 began in 1975, and it officially entered service in 1981. Designed to replace the earlier MiG-25, the MiG-31 is built for speed and altitude, capable of flying at high altitudes and supersonic speeds to intercept and destroy incoming enemy aircraft, cruise missiles, and low-flying targets.

The MiG-31 features a two-seat, twin-engine configuration and is equipped with advanced radar systems, including the Zaslon phased-array radar, which allows it to track multiple targets simultaneously at long ranges. It can carry a variety of air-to-air missiles, including the long-range R-37, making it a formidable component of Russia's air defense. The aircraft's combination of speed, range, and advanced avionics ensures it remains a key asset in the Russian Air Force's interception capabilities.

In anticipation of these strikes, Russia had already relocated some of its MiG-31s from more vulnerable bases to more remote locations, beyond the initial range of ATACMS missiles received by Ukraine. However, with Ukraine now equipped with more advanced versions of these missiles, nearly all of Crimea remains vulnerable to future attacks, forcing continuous reassessment of Russian air defense strategies and aircraft deployment.

Moreover, the partial destruction of valuable air defense systems and the damage to key facilities have strategic implications, weakening defense coverage around the critical Sevastopol naval base. These strikes are part of a broader context of increased US military support to Ukraine following the resolution of a deadlock in Congress, signaling renewed pressure on Russian forces in Ukraine.

The recent campaign of strikes on Belbek demonstrates Ukraine's enhanced ability to target and strike deep within Russian-controlled territory, showcasing not only the effectiveness of ATACMS but also sophisticated coordination in the planning and execution of these attacks.


Read more …Ukrainian Strikes Target MiG-31s at Belbek Air Base in Crimea with ATACMS Missiles

  • Hits: 12964

Analysis : Ukraine air force starts using Vietnam era high risk strategy

Breaking news


The American website Business Insider reported on May 11 that Ukrainian pilots were adopting a high-risk tactic first used by the US Air Force, thus helping to offset their numerical disadvantage against Russian air capabilities. This involves pilots flying into an area they know is covered by Russian air defense and provoking them to activate their target acquisition radars.
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* 468x15 data sheet menu top dark green */ google_ad_slot = "3500417247"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 15; // ]]>
google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* top_468x60_fiche_technique */ google_ad_slot = "2746785843"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 60; // ]]>

A MiG-29 Fulcrum takes off from Starokostiantyniv Air Base, Ukraine, Oct. 9 as part of the Clear Sky 2018 exercise. (Picture source: U.S. Air National Guard)


As soon as a Ukrainian plane is locked on, it can quickly identify the source of the emissions and then launch a missile specifically designed to counter the air defense system. The weapons include the American-made High-speed Anti-Radiation Missile (HARM) AGM-88, which the United States has been supplying to Ukraine since mid-2022.

The goal is to strike the radar associated with Moscow's surface-to-air missile (SAM) systems before they can lock on and destroy the aircraft.

This type of operation is known as Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD) or Destruction of Enemy Air Defenses (DEAD). Developed during the Vietnam War, it was initially known as "Project Ferret" in reference to the small domestic mammal used to attack and kill vermin in its burrow. It was later renamed "Wild Weasel" because Ferret had already been used for a similar operation during World War II.

The OSINT technical military commentator posted a video on X (formerly Twitter) in February showing the tactic used, during the summer of 2022, by a Ukrainian Sukhoi Su-27 (NATO Flanker) fighter jet flying at treetop level before launching a HARM.

The HARM is a 350-kilogram American air-to-ground missile equipped with a 68-kilogram high-explosive fragmentation warhead, with a maximum speed of nearly Mach 3 and a range of between 30 and 150 kilometers depending on the altitude from which it is fired. The lower the operational height, the faster the missile but the shorter its overall range. It has been widely used successfully in recent conflicts.

Initially, Ukraine struggled to integrate the HARM into its Soviet-era aircraft, as well as other missiles provided by the West. It was revealed in April by U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense William LaPlante during a speech at the annual Global Security Forum at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) that Kyiv had found a solution, according to the website War Zone: the use of iPad tablets to control the missiles.

Frederik Mertens, an analyst at The Hague's Center for Strategic Studies, said: "Ukraine is clearly adopting the experience of the Western military." He added that even though this tactic presents a high risk, in Ukraine's situation, it is worth adopting.


Read more …Analysis : Ukraine air force starts using Vietnam era high risk strategy

  • Hits: 1575

Why does Russia still use outdated armored trains in Ukraine?

Breaking news


As reported by Michael Stroud on May 1, 2024, despite their perceived obsolescence by many military forces worldwide, Russia continues to use armored trains for their combination of mobility, protection, and logistical capabilities. In Ukraine, as reported several times by the Army Recognition editorial team, these trains are used to secure extensive railway networks and support military operations in contested areas.
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* 468x15 data sheet menu top dark green */ google_ad_slot = "3500417247"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 15; // ]]>
google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* top_468x60_fiche_technique */ google_ad_slot = "2746785843"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 60; // ]]>

By the end of the 20th century, many global military forces had phased out armored trains, deeming them outdated, but the First Chechen War prompted a reevaluation by the Russian Army of the potential value of such vehicles. (Picture source: Russian social media)


By the end of the 20th century, many global military forces had phased out armored trains, deeming them outdated. For instance, the last serial Soviet armored train, the BP-1, designed to protect railway lines near the Soviet-Chinese border, was retired in the early 1990s. The First Chechen War in 1994 prompted a reevaluation by the Russian Army of the potential value of such vehicles due to practical necessities such as supplying troops with essential materials in challenging terrains and countering sabotage risks by armed groups. The Federal Service of the Railway Troops, later succeeded by the Command of the Railway Troops of the Russian Federation, took on responsibilities like restoring railway infrastructure, securing military transports, and providing protection, leading to the reintroduction of specialized armored trains.

During the Second Chechen War, which started in 1999, armored trains proved strategically valuable in safeguarding railways. Specialized trains were used extensively during the campaign, although the deteriorated railway infrastructure in Chechnya led to their cessation of movement through the region by November 1994. By 2002, special trains like "Amur," "Baikal," and "Terek" were established. In 2005, Major General V. Leshchishin reported four special trains within the United Group of Forces (OGV), including the "Don," which focused on tasks such as construction, escorting trains through hazardous sections, conducting engineering reconnaissance, demining, and addressing sabotage aftermath. Despite attacks, their operational effectiveness led to their retention within the Russian military.

Therefore, it is unsurprising that Russia still uses armored trains in Ukraine, as these vehicles are ideal for the extensive railway networks present in the country, spanning from the Luhansk region to Crimea. So far, Russia has been confirmed to have employed three armored trains in Ukraine: the Baikal and Amur, as well as the previously undisclosed Yenisei. These armored trains offer a unique combination of mobility, protection, and versatility that is difficult to replicate with other military assets.

These trains can transport troops, equipment, and supplies through contested areas while providing a fortified platform for command and control operations. They are equipped with various weapon systems, including anti-aircraft guns and artillery, which allow them to support ground operations and defend against aerial and ground threats. Their armored nature provides a high level of protection against small arms fire and shrapnel, making them resilient in hostile environments.

Moreover, the use of armored trains leverages existing rail infrastructure, which is extensive in Ukraine and the surrounding regions. Railways can facilitate the rapid movement of large quantities of military supplies and personnel across vast distances, essential for sustaining prolonged operations. This logistical advantage is significant in the context of Russia's military strategy, which often involves securing and holding large territories. Thus, while they may seem anachronistic, armored trains remain a practical asset in Russia's military toolkit.


Additional platforms, such as those observed on the Yenisei, are outfitted with 23mm ZU-23-2 anti-aircraft autocannons or BMP-2 infantry fighting vehicles, providing both defensive and offensive capabilities against diverse threats. (Picture source: Russian social media)


In Ukraine, Russian "Amur", "Baikal", and "Yenisei" armored trains perform various roles, focusing on technical reconnaissance, railway demining, and the restoration of railway tracks and minor structures. They also escort both logistical and passenger trains and may assist in the evacuation of civilians from front-line areas.

Typically, a Russian armored train includes several platforms, with the first, the "cover platform," advancing ahead to detect and address landmines, ensuring safe passage. Crew members inspect the railway tracks and surrounding area for explosive devices, with specialized sappers deciding on disarming or detonating them. Reconnaissance efforts are supported by drone technology, which surveys the route ahead to identify obstacles. Maintenance and repair teams are crucial, with a designated wagon, the "Kapterka," carrying essential supplies for repairs and operational continuity. Locomotives at both ends of the train can execute controlled detonations if explosives are encountered.

Effective coordination and communication are facilitated by a mobile radio station mounted on a ZIL-131 6x6 truck, ensuring interaction among crew members and other units. Observers at each end of the train guide locomotive operators for precise movements. The primary mission is to protect railway tracks, infrastructure, and repair teams from sabotage, including track protection and preventing attacks on railway assets.

For safety, the central locomotive is reinforced with 20-millimeter steel walls and sandbags behind wooden panels. Platforms loaded with ballast materials like sandbags, rails, and sleepers provide additional protection against mine explosions. A jamming platform with the Kamysh system disrupts radio-controlled explosive devices within a 20-meter radius.

The personnel of a typical Russian armored train have access to a range of weapons, including 23mm anti-aircraft guns, automatic grenade launchers, assault rifles, and heavy machine guns. These armaments allow the train to engage both aerial and ground-based targets. Additionally, the train comprises several platforms, each armed to address various threats. Central to its structure is an armored box made of durable steel sheets, serving as a command center and housing weaponry, with firing openings on the sides for engaging targets from within. Two rotating turrets mounted on this armored box are armed with AGS-17 automatic grenade launchers and large-caliber machine guns, providing a 160-degree firing arc.

Additional platforms are equipped with 23mm ZU-23-2 anti-aircraft autocannons capable of a rapid fire rate of 2,000 rounds per minute, engaging both aerial and ground threats. Some platforms carry BMP-2 infantry fighting vehicles or potentially T-62 tanks, offering mobile firepower with their stabilized 30mm cannons, coaxial machine guns, smoke grenade dischargers, and anti-tank guided missile launchers, ensuring a range of defensive and offensive capabilities against various threats.


Read more …Why does Russia still use outdated armored trains in Ukraine?

  • Hits: 1095

Russian Tu-22M3 Bomber Launches Kh-32 Supersonic Cruise Missile against Ukraine

Breaking news


On May 11, 2024, a video was posted on Telegram showing a Russian strategic bomber, the Tu-22M3, launching a Kh-32 supersonic air-launched cruise missile during an airstrike in Ukraine. Although the video is not dated, it clearly showcases the deployment of a Kh-32M missile, designed to target naval and ground targets.

Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* 468x15 data sheet menu top dark green */ google_ad_slot = "3500417247"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 15; // ]]>
google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* top_468x60_fiche_technique */ google_ad_slot = "2746785843"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 60; // ]]>

Russian Tu-22M3 Bomber Launches Kh-32 Supersonic Cruise Missile against Ukraine 
(Picture source: Russian Social Media)


The Kh-32, developed by Russia, is an upgraded version of the Kh-22, a long-range anti-ship missile known under the NATO codename AS-4 "Kitchen". Originally designed during the Cold War, the Kh-22 can carry heavy conventional or nuclear payloads over distances of 600 to 700 kilometers. In comparison, the Kh-32, officially adopted in 2016, stands out for its ability to reach speeds up to Mach 5 and a range of over 1,000 kilometers, enabling it to strike targets well beyond enemy air defense systems.

The Kh-32 is armed to meet various mission needs due to its payload flexibility. It can be equipped with conventional payloads for anti-ship strikes or specialized anti-radiation payloads to neutralize enemy radar installations. Its supersonic speed and long range make it an effective choice against significant naval targets, including aircraft carriers. Its anti-radiation configuration also allows it to suppress air defenses by destroying radar installations.

The first operational use of Kh-32 missiles was observed during the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Concerns have been raised by the British Ministry of Defense regarding the use of these missiles, primarily designed for naval targets, against ground targets, warning of their lack of precision and the high risk of collateral damage. Notable incidents include the June 27, 2022, attack on a shopping center in Kremenchuk, which caused numerous casualties, and strikes on June 30, 2022, in Serhiivka, which also resulted in heavy losses.

Supersonic missiles, traveling at speeds ranging from Mach 1 to Mach 5 or more, possess several notable characteristics that make them particularly effective in modern conflicts. A relevant example is the Kh-32 missile, capable of reaching speeds up to Mach 5, approximately 6,200 km/h or 3,850 mph. This high speed not only allows for rapid coverage of large distances but also significantly increases their operational range, making these missiles capable of striking distant targets much more effectively than their subsonic counterparts.

Due to their speed, these missiles also have exceptional maneuverability, allowing them to perform complex maneuvers, thus making their interception by air defense systems much more difficult. The enormous kinetic energy accumulated at these supersonic speeds further enhances their impact power, allowing them to cause significant destruction even with relatively smaller explosive payloads. Typically employed in critical missions such as anti-ship attacks, anti-air engagements, and strategic strikes against ground targets, supersonic missiles are designed to maximize speed and stealth to minimize the chances of detection and interception before reaching their target.

From a purely technical standpoint, the Kh-32 is a supersonic air-launched cruise missile with a range of 600–1,000 km developed by MKB Raduga from the Kh-22. The missile was accepted into service in 2016 as armament for the Tupolev Tu-22M3M bombers. Compared to its predecessor, the Kh-22, the Kh-32 shares the same structural design and geometric dimensions. However, significant enhancements have been made to its capabilities. Firstly, the warhead weight has been reduced to 500 kg (1,100 lb), a modification aimed at extending its range.

The Kh-32 is equipped with a more powerful engine for increased performance. Additionally, it features an advanced guidance system that includes a radar inertial guidance system with radio command correction and terrain-based referencing via an altimeter. Instead of relying on autopilot, the missile employs an automatic control system.

One of the most noteworthy improvements is its maximum range, which extends up to 620 miles (997 kilometers). In terms of penetrating air defense systems, retired Russian Colonel Konstantin Sivkov believes that the Kh-32 possesses formidable capabilities. During its final stage, the Kh-32 employs a steep dive, which makes it difficult for missile defense systems like the Aegis Combat System, equipped with Standard Missile 6 missiles, to track and engage. Furthermore, the Kh-32's multi-frequency radar offers improved resistance to electronic warfare tactics such as spot jamming.


Read more …Russian Tu-22M3 Bomber Launches Kh-32 Supersonic Cruise Missile against Ukraine

  • Hits: 1584

Stopping Russia’s operation in Kharkiv Oblast requires defeating Russia’s glide bomb threat

Breaking news


According to an article from the Institute for the Study of War, Ukraine's only solution to counter the Russian offensive in Kharkov Oblast is to use US-provided weapons in the territory of Russia. This requires the capability to defeat Russia's glide bomb threat.
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

Russian Grom 1 missile with glide bomb mod  (Picture source: Ukrainian fighter of 67th mec brigade)


Since May 10, Russia has launched a vast offensive in the north in the Kharkiv region, using air strike capabilities ahead of ground advances. This makes the ability to eliminate this aerial threat crucial. Currently, the Russians are able to strike 42,400 square kilometers, thus threatening 2,480 settlements, but the Russian strategy is effective where air defense cannot intervene. Indeed, according to the rules for materials provided by the United States, Ukraine cannot use these anti-aircraft weapons on Russian territory. In other words, Russia is leveraging Russian airspace as a sanctuary to strike Kharkiv Oblast.

Senior US government officials have issued multiple statements throughout 2023 and 2024 that Ukraine may only use US-provided weapons within Ukrainian territory and airspace, and that the US does not encourage or enable attacks within Russia, very likely also including Russian airspace (although the US prohibition on Ukraine's use of air defense systems around Kharkiv is less clear).

Ukraine cannot defend its frontline positions from Russian glide bombs as long as Ukraine cannot intercept Russian aircraft in Russian airspace with US-provided air defense systems. Russia's use of Russian airspace for these attacks underscores the urgent need for the US to provide more long-range air defense assets and to allow the Ukrainians to use them to intercept Russian aircraft in Russian airspace. Russian aircraft can strike Kharkiv City indefinitely without ever leaving the sanctuary of Russian airspace.

Kharkiv City lies 40 kilometers from Russia's international border with Ukraine. Russia's glide bombs have a glide range of 40-60 kilometers. Ukraine's air defense systems do not have the capability to intercept glide bombs once they have been launched from Russian fighter-bombers. The Russian Air Force can therefore strike Kharkiv City without ever entering Ukraine's sovereign airspace. It is absurd to constrain Ukraine's ability to counter Russia's glide bomb threat in Kharkiv at this pivotal moment.

But this point only works if the Russians continue to show a willingness to advance towards Kharkov or Kupyansk. However, given the recent destruction of bridges over the Donets River, it seems that the Russians today wish to establish a buffer zone, at least temporarily. The need to extend surveillance authorizations of airspace and destruction capabilities is also mentioned in the French and German media. This will inevitably be a major change in the continuation of the war.


Read more …Stopping Russia’s operation in Kharkiv Oblast requires defeating Russia’s glide bomb threat

  • Hits: 9788

Ukraine attacks Russian oil depot with US-made ATACMS ballistic missile

Breaking news


A recent report by the Kyiv Post on May 11, 2024, suggests that Ukraine used a US-made MGM-140 Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) tactical ballistic missile to target a Russian oil depot in the city of Rovenky, located in the occupied Luhansk region. This strike, occurring late in the evening on May 10, appears to be part of Ukraine’s continued campaign against Russian oil infrastructure, a focus since 2023.
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* 468x15 data sheet menu top dark green */ google_ad_slot = "3500417247"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 15; // ]]>
google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* top_468x60_fiche_technique */ google_ad_slot = "2746785843"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 60; // ]]>

Ukraine seems to have used a US-made MGM-140 Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) tactical ballistic missile to target a Russian oil depot in the city of Rovenky, located in the occupied Luhansk region. (Picture source: Twitter/Mario Nawfal and Lockheed Martin)


The targeted facility in Rovenky, approximately 115 kilometers east of the front lines and 60 kilometers south of Luhansk, experienced multiple explosions. Preliminary reports and videos from social media channels in the area indicate the potential use of at least one ATACMS tactical ballistic missile equipped with cluster munitions in the attack, which offers several advantages when striking targets like oil depots. Primarily, the ATACMS is a long-range missile capable of delivering a substantial payload over considerable distances, effectively reaching deep into enemy territory, which is particularly advantageous when direct engagement is risky or undesirable.

In early 2024, the United States supplied Ukraine with several ATACMS tactical ballistic missiles as part of a larger military assistance package valued at around $300 million. This action aimed to strengthen Ukraine's capacity to engage strategic sites deep within adversary territory, thereby augmenting their tactical capabilities on the battlefield. The delivery, comprising a total of 20 ATACMS missiles, was conducted discreetly due to concerns over potential Russian interference during transit. The decision to furnish these missiles followed extensive deliberations and formed part of an initiative to equip Ukraine with the means to effectively retaliate against Russian forces, particularly targeting logistical and command installations critical to Russian military operations​​.

The ATACMS itself represents a highly proficient tactical missile system notably known for its accuracy and extensive range. With the ability to engage targets at distances of nearly 300 kilometers, it serves as an effective tool for striking enemy positions well beyond frontline zones, while offering compatibility with both the M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) and the M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) supplied to Ukraine. Notably, the ATACMS is particularly useful for targeting dispersed or broad-area objectives such as military installations or infrastructure, owing to its capability to deploy either unitary or cluster munitions warheads.

When equipped with cluster munitions, the ATACMS becomes especially effective against area targets such as oil depots. Cluster munitions are designed to disperse over a wide area, increasing the likelihood of hitting the intended target even if it is spread out or has multiple components, such as storage tanks in an oil depot. This dispersal mechanism ensures extensive damage to the facility, potentially crippling the logistical and operational capabilities of the adversary.


When equipped with cluster munitions, the ATACMS becomes especially effective against area targets such as oil depots, potentially crippling the logistical and operational capabilities of the adversary. (Picture source: US DoD)


Furthermore, the use of ATACMS from mobile launchers like the M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) and the M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) enhances its effectiveness, as these launch systems can rapidly deploy the missile and relocate, reducing the risk of counterattacks. This capability has a substantial impact on the operational capabilities of the enemy, as demonstrated by Ukraine's broader series of attacks on Russian oil facilities.

Over the past year, Ukraine has escalated its military efforts, targeting oil refineries and depots across Russia, including locations such as Bryansk, Klintsy, Nizhny Novgorod, and Oryol. These strikes, predominantly executed using drones and missiles, aim to disrupt Russia’s oil processing capabilities, crucial for its military logistics and economic stability. Damage from these strikes has led to operational disruptions and shutdowns at several facilities, affecting approximately 11% of Russia’s total oil refinery capacity.

The strategic intent behind these attacks extends beyond operational disruption; they aim to inflict economic damage and expose vulnerabilities in Russia's air defense, thereby exerting psychological and moral pressure on its military resources. At the same time, Russia finds itself compelled to redeploy air defense systems from the front lines in Ukraine to protect these vital infrastructures that support its heavily mechanized, fuel-hungry army. Despite concerns voiced by US officials in the Biden administration regarding potential inflationary pressures on petroleum products ahead of presidential elections, Ukraine has continued its offensive, demonstrating commitment to this strategic approach.

Recent attacks also include a strike on May 7 in Luhansk and an early morning attack on May 10 in Russia’s Kaluga region, targeting the Pervy Zavod oil refinery. The latter, the largest oil refinery in the Kaluga region, suffered a fire after being hit by unmanned aerial vehicles. The refinery is crucial for processing commodity oil and gas condensate, with a capacity of 1.2 million tons annually. On May 9, the Kyiv Post disclosed information from Ukrainian special services about a successful strike on the Gazprom Neftekhim Salavat refinery in the Republic of Bashkortostan. This facility, one of Russia’s largest oil refining and petrochemical production complexes, was hit by a long-range drone targeting its catalytic oil cracking unit, which covered a distance of 1,500 kilometers to carry out the strike.

In the same spirit, as reported by Army Recognition in April 2024, Ukrainian forces had repurposed two Aeroprakt A-22 Foxbat light aircraft into long-range kamikaze drones. These drones were employed in two strikes in the Republic of Tatarstan, over 1,200 km from the Ukrainian border. The targets were a Shahed-136 drone manufacturing facility and an oil refinery, marking the initial implementation of such a strategy in the region and the first deployment of these UAVs since the onset of the ongoing conflict.


Read more …Ukraine attacks Russian oil depot with US-made ATACMS ballistic missile

  • Hits: 1716

Russian Lancet Drone Destroys Ukrainian FrankenSAM Air Defense System in First Reported Attack

Breaking news


A video was released on social media, showing a Russian Lancet drone on May 11, 2024, successfully targeting and destroying a Ukrainian FrankenSAM air defense missile system. This event, a major milestone, marks the first reported destruction of the FrankenSAM system since its introduction into the Ukrainian battlefield.
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

Video footage showing the Ukrainian FrankenSAM air defense missile system before it was attacked by a Russian Lancet drone. (Picture source Video footage Social Network)


The FrankenSAM system, a unique hybrid air defense missile system, combines a Soviet-era Buk air defense vehicle equipped with Western anti-aircraft missiles, including missiles like AIM-7 and RIM-7. This novel approach to integrating these technologies was first reported in December 2023, and the systems reportedly became operational in Ukraine by January 2024.

The Buk air defense system, originating from the Soviet Union and deployed since 1979, is a sophisticated medium-range, surface-to-air missile system designed to address multiple aerial threats in a combat environment. Mounted on a tracked vehicle, the Buk is highly mobile, allowing for operation across various terrains and quick repositioning, essential for effective deployment in dynamic battlefield conditions. The system comprises multiple components, including a missile launcher vehicle, target acquisition radar, and a command vehicle, which can operate independently or within a coordinated battalion setup.

The AIM-7 Sparrow is an American medium-range, radar-guided air-to-air missile extensively utilized by the US military and its allies. Designed for engagement from aircraft, the missile can target enemies at distances up to approximately 50 kilometers (31 miles) and at altitudes up to 30,000 feet. The RIM-7 Sea Sparrow's naval counterpart is adapted for shipborne air defense and can intercept incoming missiles and aircraft using similar radar guidance systems. The RIM-7 integrates with shipborne radars and firing systems, providing essential defense capabilities for naval vessels against various aerial threats.

Visual analysis of the video highlights a distinct feature of the FrankenSAM: the presence of missile containers that are uncharacteristic of traditional Soviet-Russian Buk systems. This detail underscores the unique blend of technologies employed in the FrankenSAM units.

The release of this footage has sparked discussions among military analysts about the capabilities and future impact of drone warfare on conventional air defense systems. The Lancet drone's effectiveness against a newly integrated and technologically advanced system like the FrankenSAM may prompt a reassessment of air defense strategies in the region.

The Lancet drone is a loitering munition or "kamikaze" drone developed and manufactured by Russia, designed to seek and destroy targets by crashing into them with an onboard explosive charge. It is equipped with optical sensors and can be controlled remotely to engage ground targets, making it a potent tool for precision strikes. In Ukraine, the Lancet drone is actively used by Russian forces for targeted attacks on key military assets, such as artillery positions, command centers, and air defense systems, including the recent destruction of a Ukrainian FrankenSAM air defense system. Its deployment highlights the increasing role of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in modern warfare, providing capabilities for both surveillance and direct engagement with reduced risk to personnel.


Read more …Russian Lancet Drone Destroys Ukrainian FrankenSAM Air Defense System in First Reported Attack

  • Hits: 8143

Analysis : Gps Jamming key of russian operationnal capacities in Ukraine

Breaking news


NATO countries is supplying Ukraine with a variety of high-precision weapons equipped with satellite-based guidance systems. This method of guidance has raised understandable doubts, and now they have been confirmed. Attempts to use weapons equipped with GPS receivers are encountering opposition from Russian electronic warfare systems, leading to a significant drop in the effectiveness of these Western models.

Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* 468x15 data sheet menu top dark green */ google_ad_slot = "3500417247"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 15; // ]]>
google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* top_468x60_fiche_technique */ google_ad_slot = "2746785843"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 60; // ]]>

Russian Peroed-M jamming system (Picture source: Russian "СОЗ" Group of Companies)


The global navigation system GPS, based on a constellation of satellites, was commissioned in the early 1990s. It had obvious potential, and the Pentagon decided to equip all new types of weapons and equipment with satellite signal receivers. As a result, all modern precision weapons developed by the United States or NATO use GPS as their primary or secondary guidance tool.

Since 2022, the United States and its partners have been actively supplying such weapons to the Kyiv regime. Ukrainian units have been helped to amass a wide range of ammunition of different classes and types which, as expected, should have influenced the course of hostilities. Moreover, foreign partners and patrons of Kyiv have had the opportunity to test their weapons in a large-scale conflict against a technically advanced army.

In spring 2022, it was learned that several foreign countries would transfer 155 mm caliber M982 Excalibur guided artillery shells to Ukraine. Deliveries of these products began a few weeks after the first reports. The M982 projectile is equipped with satellite and inertial navigation devices, which, according to the manufacturer, provide an error margin of no more than 4 to 5 meters.

Soon, in the summer of 2022, the first M142 HIMARS launchers were sent to Ukraine. Later, their fleet was replenished, and standardized M270 MLRS products were also transferred. Alongside these combat vehicles, steerable missiles from the GMLRS family were supplied. They have a flight range of about 90 km and are equipped with a GPS-based guidance system, which is expected to provide an error margin of no more than 8 to 10 meters at any launch distance.

In spring 2023, Ukrainian armed forces received the first batch of JDAM guided aerial bombs. These products are built on the basis of free-fall munitions and are equipped with a special control module. This includes a satellite signal receiver and an autopilot that controls the flight. In early 2024, it was learned that similar French-made AASM bombs had been delivered. The GLSDB munitions, designed to be launched from the M142 and M270, are somewhat similar to the JDAM. It also relies on satellite navigation and is guided according to pre-entered coordinates.

Unexplosed M982 Excalibur (GPS-guided 155mm shell) (Picture source: Uxo oriented telegram channel )


Since 2022, foreign countries have supplied Ukraine with numerous unmanned aerial vehicles of different classes and types. Some of these were guided munitions and used GPS to guide them to the target. Other drones use satellite signals for navigation and flight.

From the beginning, the downside of GPS and similar systems was considered to be their low resistance to electronic countermeasures. A relatively weak signal from a satellite can be suppressed by interference or replaced by a false one. Negative expectations and predictions of this type were confirmed during combat.

From the first weeks or months of the special operation, Russian units used "anti-drone guns" of different models. Specialized portable jamming stations suppress GPS signals and small drones lose the ability to navigate and fly further. Fixed stations with similar functions, capable of simultaneously covering an entire area, also became widespread.

In 2022, reports began to arrive about the successful use of other electronic warfare systems against the guided weapons of Ukrainian formations. Initially, the enemy and its supporters did not admit it, but by the end of last year, the situation had changed. Foreign military personnel and the press began to discuss the Russian response and the reduction in the effectiveness of high-precision weapons.

The first messages from abroad last year contained the most general formulations. It was advanced that Russian electronic warfare does not allow the effective use of GMLRS, GLSDB, Excalibur projectiles, etc. Problems arise with aircraft weapons and drones.

In mid-March, more precise information was presented at hearings in the U.S. House of Representatives. One of the invited specialists highlighted that at the beginning of their combat use in Ukraine, Excalibur shells had an effectiveness of about 70%. When the Russian army began to resort to electronic warfare against them, the effectiveness fell to 6%.

Recently, the U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, Bill LaPlante, spoke at one of the public events. He stated that another American model was encountering problems with interference "and other factors," and that, as a result, its effectiveness had proven low. The deputy minister did not name this sample, but from some of his statements, it can be understood that it is the latest GLSDB missile.

Faced with this decline in the effectiveness of devices present in the Ukrainian theater, the United States has announced the deployment of complementary systems to GPS functions called HOJ (Homing On GPS). The number of products ordered has not been announced, and their total cost exceeds $23.5 million. The SARA HOJ subsystems are expected to be integrated into the JDAM kit, transforming a JDAM bomb into an aerial bomb capable of hooking onto radio signal sources and targeting them. These functions are primarily intended for searching and destroying electronic warfare stations.

To conclude, radar jamming also has serious consequences for civilian aviation. Indeed, Poland has complained of interference with the GPS system on its territory, and the European Union has reported over 1600 civilian commercial flights experiencing GPS problems in recent months. These issues are very localized in Eastern Europe.


Read more …Analysis : Gps Jamming key of russian operationnal capacities in Ukraine

  • Hits: 5769

Ukrainian UAV spotted Russian T-80 tank detroyed by US-made M2A2-ODS Bradley IFV in Ukraine

Breaking news


A Ukrainian drone filmed a battle scene involving an M2A2 ODS-SA Bradley and a Russian T-80 tank, featuring an anti-tank guided missile (ATGM) TOW strike. The battle concluded with the announced destruction of the T-80 tank. This outcome is interesting because, on paper, these two vehicles would not typically engage in such a manner and produce this result. The armor and armament of the Main Battle Tank (MBT) are supposed to ensure its success against less armed and less protected vehicles. So, what led to this result?
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

An Ukrainian Bradley M2A2 uses its TOW ATGM to destroy Russian T-80 tank in close combat operation. (Picture source video footage Armed forces of Ukraine) 


The M2A2 Bradley is fundamentally designed as an Infantry Fighting Vehicle (IFV), meaning it can transport a team of infantry fighters and provide support with its 25mm Bushmaster cannon, and its two TOW missiles, which are used when the vehicle is engaged by an armored vehicle. However, these two missiles do not really provide offensive capabilities suitable for large-scale armored engagements. In its ODS-SA variant (for Operation Desert Storm Situational Awareness), a serious improvement was made to the crew's situational awareness and to increase the survivability and combat capability of the vehicle. Major improvements included an eye-safe laser rangefinder (ELRF), a tactical navigation system (TACNAV) integrating the Precision Lightweight GPS Receiver (PLGR) and Digital Compass Systems (DCS), a missile countermeasure device designed to defeat first-generation wire-guided missiles, and the Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below (FBCB2) battlefield information management system.

Internal storage was further improved, and a thermal imaging system was added for the driver. The infantry squad was again increased to seven men, with six sitting face-to-face on two benches for three in the cabin, and the seventh sitting behind the turret. A Meal, Ready-to-Eat (MRE) heater was added to the vehicle to facilitate food preparation.

The TOW (Tube-launched, Optically-tracked, Wire-guided) is an anti-tank guided missile developed by the United States in the early 1970s. It is designed to be launched from various platforms, including ground vehicles, helicopters, and fixed installations, allowing it to target and destroy armored vehicles at considerable distances. The TOW system uses wire guidance where the missile is connected by a wire to the firing post, allowing the shooter to control the missile in flight using an optical tracking system. This mechanism allows for high precision, making the missile effective even at ranges up to 3,750 meters, depending on the variants. The missile itself is capable of penetrating modern armors, including those protected by reactive armor, thanks to a shaped charge warhead.

In contrast, the T-80 is a main battle tank developed by the Soviet Union that marks a significant evolution in Russian tank design. Introduced in the 1970s, it combines innovations in mobility, firepower, and protection, recently enhanced by a BVM 2023 variant, which is gradually joining the Russian forces in Ukraine. Besides its 125mm cannon, whose reliability and precision have been massively increased in the latest variants, it is equipped with KONTAKT-5 or Relikt reactive armor, ensuring high effectiveness against shaped charges. However, this armor does not cover the entirety of the tank.

In the scene from the video, it is specified by the Ukrainian armed forces that the Russian T-80 had rolled over a mine and lost its tracks, which completely immobilized the tank and made it totally vulnerable. The Bradley's shot thus hit a weaker spot on the T80, causing its destruction.


Read more …Ukrainian UAV spotted Russian T-80 tank detroyed by US-made M2A2-ODS Bradley IFV in Ukraine

  • Hits: 6620

German newspaper reveals russian use of TOS-3 flamethrower in Ukraine

Breaking news


The Russian army has begun using the new TOS-3 Dragon flamethrower system (sometimes called TOS-1A), which turns entire districts into ruins, reports the German newspaper Die Welt. According to it, the upgraded system can hit enemy targets from a greater distance, up to 15 kilometers, and has enormous destructive power.
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* 468x15 data sheet menu top dark green */ google_ad_slot = "3500417247"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 15; // ]]>
google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* top_468x60_fiche_technique */ google_ad_slot = "2746785843"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 60; // ]]>

TOS platform during military parade in Russia  (Picture source: Donat Sorokin/TASS)


The publication notes that the Dragon's ability to strike from a greater distance greatly affects the effectiveness of enemy FPV drones and increases the survival capability of the combat vehicle. Its invulnerability to such drones is considered a distinctive feature of the TOS-1 "Solntsepek" and TOS-2 "Tosochka". At the same time, German journalists emphasized that the TOS-3 had been designed as a revolutionary weapon. Describing the capabilities of the new Russian weapon, the publication calls it "terrifying".

The prototype of the TOS-3 flamethrower system first appeared and impressed the Germans with the fact that each of its launchers could fire missiles with thermobaric warheads of great destructive power. According to the German daily, even bunkers cannot withstand the "Dragon", and a single salvo can turn several buildings into ruins.

The TOS-3 Dragon uses thermobaric rockets. Thermobaric weapons, also known as vacuum bombs or fuel-air explosives, are a type of ammunition designed to maximize damage caused by air pressure and heat during an explosion. They work by dispersing a cloud of aerosol made of very fine chemical fuel particles which, once ignited, triggers a massive explosion. This explosion consumes the surrounding oxygen and produces a shockwave of very high temperature and pressure, capable of destroying enclosed structures and causing extreme damage to living tissue primarily through blast effect and asphyxiation. Compared to conventional explosives, thermobaric weapons release their energy over a longer period and are thus particularly destructive in confined environments.

However, the main issue is the firing distance; although the 10-15 km range of the TOS-3 is superior to its predecessors, the TOS-1 and TOS-2, this short firing distance still leaves it vulnerable to counter-battery fire from Ukrainians and even some strikes from FPV drones.


Read more …German newspaper reveals russian use of TOS-3 flamethrower in Ukraine

  • Hits: 1623

From the Ukrainian Front Line: Ukrainian Tank Crews Excel with US Abrams M1A1 Tank Against Russian Tanks

Breaking news


During an exclusive interview from the front line in Ukraine, the commander of the American-made M1A1 Abrams tank from the 47th Separate Mechanized Brigade dispelled rumors suggesting that these critical combat vehicles have been removed from frontline duty. Contrary to these reports, a Ukrainian Army TV team has witnessed firsthand the Abrams crew actively engaging in combat operations against Russian forces.
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

US M1A1 Abrams MBT Main Battle Tank of the Ukrainian army 47th Separate Mechanized Brigade. (Picture source: Ukrainian Army TV)


During this unique video report, Ukrainian journalists were able to observe the American-made Abrams M1A1 Main Battle Tank (MBT) in action. The tank, known for its robust design and advanced technology, demonstrated its capabilities on the battlefield, seamlessly destroying Russian tanks and infantry.

Tank operators highlighted several key features of the Abrams that give them an edge in combat. Among these are the tank’s high-quality thermal imaging sights, which allow for superior target acquisition in various conditions. The tank's accuracy, maneuverability, and stabilization systems also stand out, ensuring that despite its heavy weight, it remains highly effective in combat scenarios.

One notable engagement detailed by the crew involved the Abrams finishing off a Russian T-62 tank that had been immobilized by an FPV drone, showcasing the adaptability of the Abrams to modern warfare techniques.

The United States has delivered a battalion of 31 M1A1 Abrams tanks to the Ukrainian army. This delivery was part of a broader commitment by the U.S. to support Ukraine in its defense against Russian aggression.

The M1A1 Abrams, a main battle tank developed by the United States, represents a significant evolution in armored warfare with its introduction in the 1980s and continuous upgrades. The tank is renowned for its exceptional survivability and lethality. Its armor includes advanced composite materials, notably incorporating depleted uranium, providing robust protection against various types of ammunition. This is complemented by its primary armament, a 120mm smoothbore cannon capable of firing a range of munitions, enabling it to engage and destroy enemy tanks and fortifications effectively.

The M1A1 is also equipped with sophisticated targeting systems, including thermal imaging and laser rangefinding, which enhance its firing accuracy across various conditions. Its powerful gas turbine engine provides remarkable speed and maneuverability, unusual for a tank of its size, with a weight exceeding 60 tons.

The tank's combat performance was notably demonstrated during the Gulf War, where it was deployed against Iraqi forces, including engagements with older Russian-made tanks like the T-72. The Abrams tanks were highly effective in these confrontations, showcasing their superior technology and firepower. The thermal sights allowed U.S. crews to detect and engage enemy tanks from greater distances and with high accuracy, often before the opposing forces were aware of their presence.

Reflecting on the capabilities of the M1A1 Abrams, a Ukrainian soldier might conclude: "The M1A1 Abrams has proven to be a decisive force multiplier for us on the battlefield. Its high-quality thermal imaging sights provide an exceptional advantage, allowing us to acquire targets with precision under various combat conditions. This, coupled with the tank's impressive accuracy, maneuverability, and stabilization, ensures that despite its substantial weight, the Abrams performs with unmatched effectiveness in combat scenarios. These features make the Abrams not just a tank, but a pivotal asset in our ongoing efforts to maintain strong defense capabilities.


Read more …From the Ukrainian Front Line: Ukrainian Tank Crews Excel with US Abrams M1A1 Tank Against Russian...

  • Hits: 34896

Putin Orders Tactical Nuclear Exercises in Response to Western Support for Ukraine

Breaking news


In response to increased Western military support for Ukraine, Russia has scheduled tactical nuclear drills to test the readiness of its non-strategic nuclear forces. The drills, which were reported by Reuters on May 6, 2024, come as the United States and France are stepping up their military aid to Ukraine, heightening geopolitical tensions. The Russian Ministry of Defense stated that these maneuvers, ordered by President Vladimir Putin, are aimed at training units to deploy non-strategic nuclear weapons and will involve undisclosed missile and aviation formations in the Southern Military District, a strategic area that includes territories close to and occupied by Ukraine.

google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* 468x15 data sheet menu top dark green */ google_ad_slot = "3500417247"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 15; // ]]>
google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* top_468x60_fiche_technique */ google_ad_slot = "2746785843"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 60; // ]]>

The TU-160 during the Victory Day Parade in Russia in 2013 (Picture source: Vitaly Kuzmin)


Following recent statements by French President Emmanuel Macron, who has not ruled out sending troops to Ukraine, the Russian Foreign Ministry criticized Macron for what it described as irresponsible remarks. It also made an unsubstantiated claim that mercenaries from the French Foreign Legion are present in Ukraine. The French Ministry of Defense has since denied this information. Macron's statements and the Russian response demonstrate a strategically ambiguous stance by the West, aiming to maintain credibility while defining the limits of Western military action. This posture aims to continue supporting Ukraine while deterring Russia by obscuring potential future actions.

This escalation serves as a reminder that the world could be edging closer to a direct confrontation between two nuclear powers: Russia and NATO. Russia has regularly discussed its nuclear capability in domestic discussions, with pressures for Putin to modify the country's nuclear doctrine to specify when and how these weapons might be used. Additionally, Russia has begun deploying tactical nuclear weapons in neighboring Belarus, thereby increasing regional tensions.

This tense context underscores the significance of the announced nuclear exercises as a specific response to developments in the West, signaling a potentially new and precarious era in nuclear signaling between Russia and the West.

Russia's nuclear arsenal, already formidable, continues to undergo significant modernizations aimed at replacing most Soviet-era armaments by the late 2020s. Russia's strategic nuclear forces comprise three components: land-based forces with intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), an air component with strategic bombers, and a naval force with ballistic missile submarines.

Russian ICBMs include models such as the RS-24 Yars, a mobile missile capable of carrying multiple independently targetable nuclear warheads (MIRV), and the R-36M2 Voevoda, one of the most powerful missiles ever built, capable of carrying up to 10 thermonuclear warheads. The RS-28 Sarmat, also known as "Satan 2", is the latest addition to the arsenal, promising even greater missile defense penetration capabilities thanks to its speed and maneuverability.

Regarding strategic bombers, Russia operates the Tupolev Tu-160, a supersonic bomber capable of carrying long-range nuclear cruise missiles, and the Tu-95, which can launch cruise missiles from significant distances. These aircraft are regularly upgraded to enhance their survivability and operational effectiveness.

The naval component includes Borei-class submarines equipped with Bulava ballistic missiles. These submarines are designed to be less detectable and capable of launching their missiles from deep underwater, allowing them to remain hidden from enemy radar.

According to open sources, Russia has about 4,489 nuclear warheads, some deployed and others in reserve. The U.S. government estimates that Russia possesses up to 2,000 tactical nuclear weapons, including short-range ballistic missiles, air-dropped gravity bombs, torpedoes, and artillery shells.

Russian nuclear doctrine, revised over the years since the end of the Cold War, states that nuclear weapons may be used in response to an attack with weapons of mass destruction against Russia or its allies, or in response to a conventional attack that threatens the very existence of the Russian state.

Infographic showing the different Russian land-based missiles in January 2021 (Picture source: CSIS)


Read more …Putin Orders Tactical Nuclear Exercises in Response to Western Support for Ukraine

  • Hits: 1030

Analysis: Russian Sabotage Across Europe A Declaration of War or a wrong trail ?

Breaking news


At least four European intelligence services have warned their governments about "imminent" acts of sabotage by Russia on European soil, the Financial Times revealed this on May 5, 2024. The reports indicate that Russia is intensifying its efforts to carry out bombings, fires , and sabotages across the continent, signaling its engagement in new form of conflict with the West.
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* 468x15 data sheet menu top dark green */ google_ad_slot = "3500417247"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 15; // ]]>
google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* top_468x60_fiche_technique */ google_ad_slot = "2746785843"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 60; // ]]>

Diehl factory buring in Berlin on May 3, 2024 (Picture source: X)


Thomas Haldenwang, the head of the German intelligence service ( BundesNarichtenDienst), reportedly warned his French, British, and Swedish counterparts of the "risk of state-initiated Russian sabotage" which "has significantly increased." A wave of Russian attacks on European soil "with high potential for human and material damage" is even imminent, according to the German intelligence chief.

Recent incidents suggest that this destabilization operation is already underway. Here is a comprehensive list:

Wales:

  • An explosion occurred on April 16, 2024, at the BAE Systems factory in Glascoed.

England:

  • A fire broke out in a warehouse containing shipments bound for Ukraine; those arrested claimed they were acting on orders from Moscow (end of April).

Sweden:

  • A series of train derailments suspected of being acts of sabotage backed by the Kremlin are currently under investigation by local authorities (March-April).

Germany:

  • Two German-Russian nationals were arrested for planning attacks against military and logistical sites.
  • A fire occurred at the Diehl Defence building in Berlin on May 3.

Estonia:

  • The prime minister's vehicle was attacked, deemed a pro-Russian action by security services.

Czech Republic:

  • Attempts at sabotage have been reported on the country's railways between March and April.

European Airspace:

  • GPS jamming actions have been making it impossible for civilian aircraft to fly over certain areas for a few months, predominantly in Eastern Europe.

According to analysts, Russia's aggression is not limited to physical attacks but also includes disinformation campaigns and cyber hacking.


Maps of alleged Russian sabotage in Europe since February 2024  (Picture source: X)


The expulsion of 600 Russian intelligence officers across the continent, who operated under the guise of diplomatic activity following the invasion of Ukraine, has prompted a strategic shift. Russia is now using proxies and coordinating intelligence operations more systematically.

European governments are responding to this growing threat through increased cooperation and vigilance. NATO declared last month that it was deeply concerned about Russia's "malicious activities" on the territory of its allies and urged member states to remain vigilant in the face of the evolving threat. Security services across the continent are on high alert, seeking to identify and mitigate potential threats.

The Russian objective behind these attacks is to test European organizations in areas related to the defense universe but not purely military, such as logistics, diplomatic support, and civilian capabilities like GPS. It's important to keep in mind that while these actions are purportedly by Russians, in most cases the arrested individuals have not acknowledged Russia's involvement, so these are assumptions.

Therefore, the situation must be actively monitored, as the risk of real sabotage actions carried out by Russia is increased due to the growing involvement of European states in supporting the war and the recent bellicose statements made.

Read more …Analysis: Russian Sabotage Across Europe A Declaration of War or a wrong trail ?

  • Hits: 1517

Russia prepares assault using KH-35 anti-ship missile to strike a major land target near Kharkiv

Breaking news


According to Russian sources, a Ukrainian radar station was reportedly destroyed by a Russian Kh-35 missile during a strike conducted on May 5, 2024. This radar station was located in the Fedorovka area in the Kharkov region (x: 35.74507 y:49.82564). This strike inevitably reduces Ukrainian capabilities for missile and aircraft detection in the Kharkov area. The loss of this radar further supports Ukrainian demands regarding air defense systems and creates a favorable situation for Russian operations in the Kharkov zone.
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* 468x15 data sheet menu top dark green */ google_ad_slot = "3500417247"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 15; // ]]>
google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* top_468x60_fiche_technique */ google_ad_slot = "2746785843"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 60; // ]]>

Reco UAV view during minutes before the strike on P-18 (Picture source: Russian fighters)


The P18 radar system, developed by the Russian company NPO Almaz, is a long-range surveillance radar designed to detect and track a wide variety of airborne targets, including aircraft, helicopters, drones, and ballistic missiles. This radar is part of the P-ESA (Active Electronically Scanned Array) radar family, which uses electronically scanned antennas for wider coverage and better detection accuracy. The P18 is often used for monitoring airspace, borders, and strategic areas, offering advanced detection capability in various environments and difficult weather conditions.

One of the key features of the P18 system is its ability to detect stealthy targets due to its advanced signal processing techniques and high sensitivity. It is equipped with multiple operating modes, including air surveillance mode, ground surveillance mode, and maritime surveillance mode, allowing it to adapt to different operational scenarios. Additionally, the P18 can be integrated into larger air defense networks to share real-time surveillance data and improve coordination in response to potential threats.

In contrast, the KH-35 missile, originally an anti-ship missile, has characteristics that make it interesting for strikes against such targets. The Russian X-35 missile, also known as Kh-35 Uranus, is a subsonic cruise anti-ship missile developed by the Russian Tactical Missiles Corporation. Designed for use by fighter aircraft and surface ships, the X-35 is capable of striking maritime targets at distances of up to 260 kilometers, with increased accuracy thanks to its inertial guidance system and terminal active or passive radar.

One of the key features of the X-35 is its ability to fly at extremely low altitudes, often below 10 meters above sea level, making it difficult to detect and intercept for adversary air defense systems. It is also equipped with electronic countermeasures to counter attempts to jam or disrupt its guidance.

The X-35 is deployable from a variety of platforms, including fighter aircraft such as the Su-30 and MiG-29, as well as surface ships and submarines equipped with vertical launchers. The X-35 is therefore very useful for strikes against detection systems because Ukrainians are now able to intercept even Kinzhal missiles with a relative success probability.

The flight characteristics below radar detection cones are thus particularly interesting for the Russians. Several days ago on May 3rd, 2024 a KH-35 Uranus destroyed a German IRIS-T air defense system. 


Read more …Russia prepares assault using KH-35 anti-ship missile to strike a major land target near Kharkiv

  • Hits: 2024

Russia captures first US-supplied Bradley M7 BFIST Fire Support Vehicle in Ukraine

Breaking news


On May 2, 2024, several Russian media reported that Russian forces had captured a US-supplied Bradley M7 Fire Support Vehicle (B-FiST), used by the Ukrainian Armed Forces, in the Avdiivka direction. Out of 55 manufactured, four Bradley M7 BFIST vehicles were reportedly received by Ukraine, with its initial deployment by Ukrainian Forces on the Zaporizhzhia front in September 2023.
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* 468x15 data sheet menu top dark green */ google_ad_slot = "3500417247"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 15; // ]]>
google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* top_468x60_fiche_technique */ google_ad_slot = "2746785843"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 60; // ]]>

This vehicle, equipped with Bradley Reactive Armour Tiles (BRAT), was part of a batch of four vehicles delivered to Ukraine from a total of 55 manufactured. (Picture source: Russian social media and US DoD)


Tactically, the M7 BFIST is specifically designed to enable precise coordination of indirect fire at distances of up to 8,000 meters, effectively integrating artillery support with ground forces. Should Russian forces gain access to and analyze the operational capabilities of the captured M7 BFIST, it could furnish them with valuable insights into U.S. artillery support tactics, potentially influencing their own military operations.

From a technological standpoint, the M7 BFIST incorporates advanced targeting and sensor technologies designed to operate under armored protection, thereby enhancing crew survivability while maintaining operational effectiveness in diverse combat scenarios. Analysis of these systems by Russian forces could lead to advancements in their own military vehicle designs, potentially incorporating similar or counter technologies.

In terms of engineering, the vehicle's design features a Cummins VTA-903T diesel engine and robust mobility and armor systems, essential for operations across varied environments. A thorough examination of these features could enable Russian military engineers to gain insights into the vehicle's performance characteristics and durability, potentially influencing future developments in Russian military vehicle design. Additionally, such analysis could aid in developing strategies to counter similar systems provided to allies of Ukraine in the field.

On September 5, 2023, Army Recognition reported that Ukrainian Forces had deployed the Bradley M7 BFIST, designed for target identification and coordination of indirect artillery fire, for the first time on the Zaporizhzhia front. This vehicle, equipped with Bradley Reactive Armour Tiles (BRAT), was part of a batch of four vehicles delivered to Ukraine from a total of 55 manufactured, according to available information. Originally based on the Bradley M2A2 ODS-SA Infantry Fighting Vehicle (IFV), the M7 BFIST has undergone significant modifications, replacing the traditional launcher unit for TOW anti-tank missiles with advanced target location equipment and sensors.

The M7 Bradley BFIST, operational up to 20 kilometers, is compatible with systems such as the M142 HIMARS, M270 MLRS, and various munitions including the M982 Excalibur 155mm precision howitzer rounds. It is based on the Bradley M2A2 ODS-SA Infantry Fighting Vehicle but has been modified to replace the traditional launcher unit for TOW anti-tank missiles with advanced target location equipment and sensors, enhancing its target spotting and artillery coordination capabilities.

Introduced into service in 2000, the M7 Bradley BFIST is operated by a crew of four. It is powered by a 600hp Cummins VTA-903-T600 engine, achieving a maximum road speed of 61 km/h and an amphibious speed of about 6 km/h. The vehicle is capable of handling gradients of up to 60%, side slopes of 40%, vertical steps of 0.76 meters, and trench crossings of 2.54 meters. With appropriate preparations, it can ford water to a depth of about 1.2 meters.

The vehicle's armament includes a 25 mm Bushmaster chain gun and a coaxial 7.62 mm machine gun, with ammunition loads suitable for various defensive and offensive operations. It is armored to withstand impacts from 30 mm armor-piercing rounds and 14.5 mm heavy machine gun fire, with options for additional protection through explosive reactive armor. Its transportability by military aircraft like the C-17 Globemaster III or C-5M Super Galaxy enhances its deployment capabilities.


Read more …Russia captures first US-supplied Bradley M7 BFIST Fire Support Vehicle in Ukraine

  • Hits: 3007

Analysis: Houthis arsenal used against Western ships in Red Sea

Breaking news


After Israel launched a military operation against the Palestinian movement Hamas, the Yemeni Islamist group Ansar Allah, better known as the Houthis, have been attacking commercial and military ships in the Red Sea since early October 2023 using attack drones and missiles. The Houthis declared that they had joined the war alongside Hamas and claim that they only target ships docking at Israeli ports or those owned by entities with links to Israel. The Houthi attacks have severely hindered international maritime transport, and a number of companies have announced they will no longer send their ships through the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, which connects the Gulf of Aden to the Red Sea and is one of the most important maritime routes.


Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* 468x15 data sheet menu top dark green */ google_ad_slot = "3500417247"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 15; // ]]>
google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* top_468x60_fiche_technique */ google_ad_slot = "2746785843"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 60; // ]]>

Houthis rebels near occidental ferry ship named Galaxy Leader. The ship was air assaulted by Houthis on October 19, 2023(Picture source: Reuters)


In their early attacks, the militants landed on ship decks from helicopters and tried to capture them using small boats. It is known that the Houthis try to use unmanned fast boats to block navigation, but the greatest danger comes from unmanned aerial vehicles and anti-ship missiles. Iran is the main supplier of anti-ship weapons to the Houthis. In Yemen, samples of Soviet and Chinese production, legally acquired before the outbreak of the civil war in the country, might still exist.

The armed formations of the Ansar Allah group have more than ten types of unmanned aerial vehicles of various configurations, including disposable kamikaze drones, attack drones capable of carrying missiles and light bombs, as well as vehicles designed for reconnaissance and surveillance.

In the past, the Qasef-1 and Qasef-2K drones, identified as Iranian drones from the Ababil family, have been used to strike targets controlled by the anti-Houthi Arab coalition forces in Yemen and Saudi Arabia.

In Iran, since 1999, these types of devices have been primarily used as aerial targets for air defense crew training. However, according to information published in English-language sources, the Houthis have tried to use these drones, equipped with either a passive radar or a video camera with image broadcasting equipment and remote control, against the radars of Saudi Patriot air defense systems and have attacked the Al-Anad Air Base in Yemen, occupied by Arab coalition forces.

The Qasef-1 drone is built with a canard design and has a thin, elongated fuselage 2.9 meters long, a slightly swept-forward horizontal tail, and a wing with a wingspan of up to 3.25 meters. The fuselage and wing are made of composite materials. It has a piston engine of about 20 horsepower and, with a pusher propeller at the rear of the fuselage, it reaches speeds of about 200 km/h. The flight duration is 1.5 hours, and the range is at least 120 km. The ceiling reaches 3 km. A warhead weighing up to 40 kg is used to strike a target.

Qasef-1 Drone

There is no doubt that a remotely piloted aircraft with such characteristics could pose a serious threat to civilian ships.

The Samad-2 and Samad-3 drones have been used several times in the past to attack targets in Saudi Arabia, Israel, and the United Arab Emirates. On November 29, 2023, the American destroyer USS Carney (DDG-64) shot down a Samad-3 drone in the southern Red Sea, which had been launched from Houthi-controlled territory in Yemen and was headed towards the USNS Supply (T-AOE-6) replenishment ship.

Samad-2 Drone

The Samad-2 drone is 2.8 meters long with a wingspan of 4.5 meters. It features a distinctive V-tail and is equipped with a pusher propeller driven by a 17.6 horsepower Chinese DLE 170 engine. Maximum speed – up to 200 km/h. Its flight range is about 1,200 km. The Samad-2 can carry both reconnaissance equipment and a warhead weighing 18 kg.

Samad-3 Drone

The Samad-3 drone differs from the previous model by having a conformal fuel tank mounted on top of the drone. With a flight range of up to 1,500 km, the mass of the explosive charge can reach 40 kg.

The Samad-4 is an attack drone capable of carrying unguided missiles and bombs. Previous Iranian Samad-type drones were intended for reconnaissance or had a warhead embedded in the body.

Samad-4 Drone

Open sources indicate that the Samad-4 has increased dimensions and a more powerful engine compared to previous models.

The Houthis also have a Shehab drone. Its exact specifications and purpose are unknown.

Shehab Drone

It is believed to be a reconnaissance drone with a range of up to 50 km, also capable of carrying a combat load and being used as a loitering munition.

The device bearing the Yemeni designation Waaed is none other than the Iranian Shahed-136.

Drone Waaed

The characteristics of this tailless kamikaze drone are well known. With a weight of about 200 kg, its flight range exceeds 1,000 km. Flight altitude: 50 to 4,000 m. Length – 3.5 m. Wingspan – 2.5 m. The two-stroke MADO MD 550 piston engine made in Iran offers a cruising speed of 150 to 170 km/h.

In 2021, the Houthis demonstrated the Khatif-1 tele-guided loitering munition, with a range of several tens of kilometers.

Khatif-1

An enhanced modification, known as Khatif-2, appeared in 2022. The data of this remotely piloted kamikaze drone are not disclosed. Estimates suggest it would be equipped with a warhead weighing up to 10 kg.


Anti-ship cruise missiles 


During the Soviet era, the Yemeni Navy received a small missile boat, Project 1241.1 Molniya, and two missile boats, Project 205 Moskit. The Soviet MRK (small missile ship) and RK (missile boat) were armed with anti-ship missiles P-22 (export version of the P-15M) with a firing range of about 40 km.

Yemen also had several coastal missile systems equipped with Chinese anti-ship missiles S-201 (an evolution of the P-15), supplied by Iran. During the Iran-Iraq war, Iran acquired them from China. The anti-ship missiles, dubbed "Silk Warm" in the West, were actively used in combat operations. By the late 1980s, Iran had launched its production of S-201 missiles.

Today, the anti-ship cruise missiles P-22 and S-201, whose engines operate on liquid fuel and oxidizer, and whose lineage dates back to the anti-ship missile P-15 introduced in 1959, are archaic. Thanks to larger capacity tanks, the flight range of the Chinese S-201 has increased to 100 km. At the same time, the increase in fuel and oxidizer supply on board has led to an increase in the dimensions of the rocket and excludes the possibility of placing it on boats.

The missile carries a heavy highly explosive and penetrating warhead weighing 513 kg, but due to the subsonic flight speed and the low noise immunity of the active radar seeker, its effectiveness in modern conditions is low. Additionally, during missile refueling, the crew is required to work with protective suits and isolating gas masks.


C-201 anti-ship missiles

Despite its poor performance and operational issues, the Houthis regularly display the S-201 during parades, and military experts believe that this old anti-ship missile poses a certain danger to commercial fleets.

In 1995, China provided Yemen with three Type 037IG missile boats equipped with solid-fueled anti-ship missiles YJ-8 (export designation C-801), which have characteristics similar to early versions of Exocet anti-ship missiles.

The boats themselves were sunk following Saudi airstrikes, but the missiles were salvaged, and the Al-Mandab-1 coastal defense complex was built on their basis.

 Al-Mandab-1

The maximum firing range of Al-Mandab-1 missiles when launched from a mobile coastal launcher does not exceed 40 km. The guidance system is an active radar. The flight speed of the anti-ship missiles is subsonic.

Despite all their advantages, solid-fueled missiles generally have a shorter launch range than missiles equipped with ramjet and turbojet engines. Therefore, by using the aerodynamic design and guidance system of the YJ-8, the People's Republic of China (PRC) has developed the YJ-82 (S-802) anti-ship missile equipped with a compact turbojet engine. The range of the new missile has more than doubled. The first C-802 anti-ship missiles arrived in Iran in the mid-1990s, along with Chinese-made missile-launching boats. Soon, Iran began assembling missiles independently. The Iranian version of the S-802 was called Noor.


RCC Noor

In terms of weight and size characteristics, range, and flight speed, the Nur anti-ship missile system is in many ways similar to the American Harpoon RGM-84, but it is not known to what extent the noise immunity and selectivity characteristics correspond to the American model.

A longer-range option is the Iranian Ghader anti-ship missile, created based on the Chinese C-803 with a firing range of up to 250 km.

Al-Mandab-2 Anti-Ship Missiles

This missile is equipped with a more economical turbojet engine, a larger fuel tank capacity, and a highly explosive penetrating warhead weighing 185 kg. The Houthis have given this anti-ship missile the name Al-Mandab-2.

In 2019, the Houthis showcased the Quds-1 cruise missile, which appears to be a modification of the Iranian Soumar missile. The creation of the Soumar missile launcher became possible after Ukraine sold the Soviet X-55 air-launched missile launcher to Iran.

Presumably, Quds-1 is a simplified version of the Soumar missile launcher, developed in Iran for wartime production. The Yemeni missile has a shorter flight range, and its wing is not foldable.

Quds-1 Cruise Missile

Reference works indicate that the Quds-1 missile launcher is primarily intended for attacks on fixed targets. Its range is 150 km. The rocket is powered by an unlicensed version of the compact TJ-100 turbojet engine developed by the Czech company PBS Velká Bíteš with a thrust of up to 1,250 N, which allows a speed of about 800 km/h. Length - 5.6 m. The diameter of the casing - 400 mm.

Quds-2 Anti-Ship Missiles

The Quds Z-0 missile, created based on a modified Quds-2 missile launcher (introduced in 2021), has received an electro-optical system and can be used against surface targets.

Quds Z-0 Anti-Ship Missiles

The latest modification, Quds-3, is believed to have a firing range of over 800 km, but the guidance system installed is not known for certain.

In 2022, the Houthis also unveiled a relatively compact anti-ship cruise missile called Sahil.

Experts believe it is an Iranian light anti-ship missile Fajr Darya, copied from the Chinese FL-6 missile. In turn, the FL-6 appeared after Chinese specialists had access to the Italian compact anti-ship missile system Si Killer. These relatively small and inexpensive anti-ship missiles are designed to combat "mosquito fleet" ships with a displacement of up to 1,000 tons and counter amphibious operations in the coastal area. Their firing range is about 40 km. Sahil missiles can be equipped with a TV or IR seeker. With a launch weight of 300 kg, the rocket carries a 60 kg warhead.

In the late 1980s, based on the American air-to-ground missile AGM-65 Maverick, the compact short-range anti-ship missile system YJ-7 (S-701) was created in China. But unlike the American prototype, the Chinese missile, in addition to helicopters and aircraft, can be used from portable launchers mounted on light boats and automobile chassis.

YJ-73 Drone

In 2008, at the 7th Zhuhai Airshow, the YJ-73 (S-703) anti-ship missile system with a millimeter-wave radar seeker was first showcased. After that, the YJ-74 (S-704) and YJ-75 (S-705) missiles appeared with a television guidance system and a new radar seeker with increased noise immunity. The launch range of these modifications reaches 35 km.

YJ-7 missiles were delivered to Iran, from where they fell into the hands of militants from various Islamist groups and gained a reputation as "guerrilla" missiles. During the 2006 Lebanon War, a Chinese-made YJ-7 missile attacked the Israeli corvette Hanit. The ship was damaged but remained afloat, and four crew members were killed. According to Western intelligence services, the Houthis also have these compact anti-ship missiles.
Missiles balistiques antinavires

alleged ballistic missiles ? 

In the territories captured by the Houthis, S-75M/M3 Volga air defense systems equipped with B-755 and B-759 missiles remained. In 2015, Al-Masirah TV aired a report showing Qaher-1 tactical missiles, converted from anti-aircraft missiles. It is reported that the conversion work of the anti-missile defense system was carried out by the military industry department of the army and the popular committees.

In 2022, the Houthis showcased an anti-ship ballistic missile Mohit, created based on a missile defense system, which, in the final stage of its flight, targets the thermal signature of the target. At the same time, searching for and capturing a large ship sailing with engines running is possible within an ellipse measuring 700 x 500 m.

The use of a missile, not much different from an anti-aircraft missile, within a naval tactical or anti-aircraft complex, reduces production and maintenance costs and facilitates personnel training. However, the effectiveness of these weapons is highly questionable.

The missile carries a relatively light warhead, which is not powerful enough to effectively hit hardened targets. The large dispersion from the aiming point justifies its use only against large-scale targets located on the front lines: airfields, transport centers, cities, and large industrial enterprises.

At the same time, the effectiveness of an anti-ship ballistic missile with an infrared seeker, which captures a moving target on the descending branch of the trajectory in a short period of time, raises serious doubts. The separation of the first stage of solid fuel during the launch of a rocket above the location of friendly troops can pose a danger.

Preparing a rocket equipped with a liquid propellant engine for combat use is a rather complex process. Transporting a fully fueled rocket over long distances being impossible, refueling with oxidizer is done in the immediate vicinity of the launch position. After which, the missile is transferred from the loading-transport vehicle to the launcher. It is clear that a missile battery, which contains conveyors and large tanks containing flammable fuel and caustic oxidizer that ignite flammable substances within the reach of enemy weapons, is a very vulnerable target.

Apparently, Iran and the leaders of the Ansar Allah group rely on high-speed anti-ship ballistic missiles, which allow them to launch surprise attacks on maritime targets appearing near the coast of Yemen.

In 2011, a towed launcher equipped with the Khalij Fars anti-ship missile was showcased in Baharestan Square in Tehran. It is known that the Khalij Fars missile, controlled in the final stage of flight, is designed based on the Fateh-110 ballistic SRBM.

The anti-ship ballistic missile, whose name translates to "Persian Gulf", has a firing range of about 200 km and is controlled by an inertial system for most of the flight. On the descending branch of the trajectory, guidance is performed by an infrared seeker that responds to the thermal signature of the ship or by a radio-television guidance-command system. Foreign observers indicate that these guidance systems are highly susceptible to organized interference and may be effective mainly against slow civilian ships.

In Yemen, Iranian Khalij Fars missiles, designated Aasif', were showcased during a military parade in 2022. Simultaneously with the Aasif anti-ship ballistic missile, the Tankil missile, created based on the Iranian Raad-500 SRBM with a firing range of up to 500 km, was presented. Five years ago, Iran tested the light anti-ship missile Fajr-4. Sources write that it was originally created to be launched from airborne carriers, but the Fajr-4CL modifiation, renamed Faleq-1 in Yemen, is intended to be used from coastal launchers. The missile equipped with an optoelectronic camera and a command guidance system is capable of hitting targets at a distance of about 50 km.


An efficient Methods ? 

In mid-February 2024, the Houthis had used several dozen kamikaze drones, cruise missiles, and anti-ship ballistic missiles against foreign ships.

On December 15, 2023, two container ships were hit by missiles in the Red Sea, resulting in a fire onboard. The ship Palatium III, owned by the Swiss company MSC, according to the U.S. military, was struck by an anti-ship ballistic missile. In this case, the Houthis were the first in the world to successfully launch a ballistic missile at a ship under real conditions.

However, the effectiveness of Yemeni drones and anti-ship missiles is low. Slow and cumbersome drones are very easy targets for onboard air defense systems. They are also successfully countered not only by the supersonic F/A-18C/D Super Hornet fighter jets but also by the subsonic AV-8B Harrier II attack aircraft of the Marine Corps, which are designated as targets by the ship's Aegis system. Foreign authors write that in a number of cases, drone control systems have been successfully jammed by the U.S. Navy's AN/SLQ-32 naval electronic warfare equipment.

As for the Houthi anti-ship cruise missiles, they are still subsonic and, in most cases, are quickly intercepted by RIM-156 (Standard-2ER Block IV), RIM-7P Sea Sparrow, and RIM-162 ESSM missiles. However, on January 31, 2024, the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Gravely (DDG-107) was forced to repel an attacking anti-ship missile system using a 20mm Mark 15 Phalanx CIWS close-in weapon system.

As already mentioned, the guidance systems of anti-ship ballistic missiles have a relatively narrow field of view and are only able to search for targets at the final stage of flight. Given that anti-ship ballistic missiles receive a target designation before launch and are controlled for most of the flight by an inertial system, whose error accumulates as the range increases, this reduces effectiveness when firing at rapidly moving targets. Most often, the target does not appear at the intended point. Furthermore, missiles flying along a ballistic trajectory, unlike low-altitude cruise anti-ship missiles, are usually detected by onboard surveillance radars immediately after launch, and their predictable trajectory facilitates interception.

The weakest link for the Houthis in countering maritime transport efforts since the United States and the United Kingdom began airstrikes in Yemen on January 12, 2024, is intelligence. Aviation cruise missiles and Tomahawks have destroyed or damaged control posts, communication centers, radars controlling the maritime zone, positions of coastal missile systems, drone bases, and control stations.

In most cases, reconnaissance attempts using drones were quickly thwarted before patrol drones had time to designate targets. The activation of "dormant" radars on the shore was recorded by RTR means, after which bombs and missiles were launched at them.

In the short term, a decrease in the number of missile attacks on tankers and container ships off the coast of Yemen can be expected, but as an alternative, the Houthis could start laying large-scale mines on shipping lanes.


Read more …Analysis: Houthis arsenal used against Western ships in Red Sea

  • Hits: 1481
Copyright © 2019 - 2024 Army Recognition | Webdesign by Zzam